WIN INNOVATION / SCIBERSECURITY

Cybersecurity in SpainAccess with criteria.
Information under control.

In the Subbetica, the examples distinguish furniture chips, product information, ceramics and appointment service.

Access Documents Integrations

01 / CONTEXTS OF SUBBETICS

Access follows the function of each business.

In the Subbetica, the examples distinguish furniture chips, product information, ceramics and appointment service. Access is reviewed according to who prepares, validates or shares this information.

ELIGE A CONTEXT

Examples to talk to your team. The selection does not examine accounts or systems.

PROPOSED REVISION / 01

Preparation rolls

THE INFORMATION IMPORTS

Custom or product files that pass between attention and work equipment.

WHAT COMPROBAR

Check who modifies preferences and sources and how the accepted version is recognized before further preparation.

What to check with your team

Business functions and permissions of your work sheets.

02 / CRITERIA WHICH MAY BE REVISED

What every person needs.
For as long as you need it.

A function, an access

To link the tasks with the permits for consultation, change and export. Check high, function changes and low.

Share with limits

Identify the approved version, its recipients and available options to limit or remove the link.

Connections with responsible

Know which applications exchange data, which actions can be executed and who authorizes your credentials.

Know the cybersecurity service

03 / FROM THE CONTEXT TO THE AGREEMENT

A useful review
leaves decisions
that can be followed.

Business functions and permissions of your work sheets.

  1. 01

    Determine information

    Custom or product files that pass between attention and work equipment. The set of tools and documents that will enter the review is agreed.

  2. 02

    Relating persons and permits

    Check who modifies preferences and sources and how the accepted version is recognized before further preparation. Each decision contrasts with the person who knows the work and manages the application.

  3. 03

    Check how you share

    To review the recipients of each document and how their access to the relevant order or service is limited. The available options are reviewed in the tools used, before proposing changes.

  4. 04

    Documenting and monitoring

    User ratio and procedure of ups, changes and downs. They are recorded responsible, decisions and agreed checks to review access when the activity changes.

CIBERSECURITY / TERRITORY

The review starts near your work.

Explora propuestas locales sobre accesos, documentos y herramientas conectadas.

6 available proposals

01 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Lucena

The manufacturing sheet also needs control.

02 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Benameji

Atender does not mean having access to all management.

03 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Rute

The composition of the gift needs a recognizable version.

04 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Goat

The reception needs data, with clear limits.

05 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Dona Mencia

Experience shares data, with criteria.

06 / LOCAL PROPOSAL

Priego de Córdoba

Provenance should be available with a view to consultation.

LOCAL CONTEXT

Subbetics

A concrete place.
An agreed scope.

The directory connects with municipal proposals and their location links. The examples guide the conversation; the tools, access and scope are agreed with each company.

Back to previous level

04 / BEFORE

What to check.
What to agree.

Where can a Subbetic company start?

In the Subbetica, the examples distinguish furniture chips, product information, ceramics and appointment service. Access is reviewed according to who prepares, validates or shares this information. A first set of information to be defined would be: custom or product files that pass between attention and work equipment.

What documentation should we have at hand?

Business functions and permissions of your work sheets. It also identifies who manages each tool and who authorizes permit changes.

How is collaboration with third parties reviewed?

To review the recipients of each document and how their access to the relevant order or service is limited. It is remembered which people can pass access and who reviews their withdrawal at the end of the work.

Is the panel analyzing my company?

No. Please provide examples of a review to talk to your team. It does not examine accounts, devices or networks or provide a safety diagnosis. The actual checks require an agreed scope and access.

Are recovery options reviewed?

The versioning and recovery options available in the tools included in the project can be reviewed and evidence can be agreed with your manager. Their availability and limits are checked with each supplier; no complete recovery or a managed copy service is promised.

What does the project include and how does the cost be agreed?

The scope is part of the tools, functions and documentation used by the company. The reviews of access, permits, information and integration, good practices and changes to be made are agreed. The phases and cost are determined before starting.

Start with what
your team uses.

Tell us how the information is shared in your Subbetica company. We will start from a specific set of documents, access or connections to agree what to review with your team.

Talk about my company